Best PRP Hair Treatment in Pune: Everything You Need to Know Before Getting Started
October 5, 2026
No Comments
Read More »
Written by: Dr. Kiran Chotaliya Editorial Team · Reviewed by: Dr. Kiran Chotaliya, M.D. Dermatologist & Chief Hair transplant Surgeon · Hairfree & Hairgrow Clinics, India · Updated September 2026
This case study follows the 12-month hair transplant repair journey of a 27-year-old male who had been experiencing slow, progressive hair loss for approximately 6 years. He had previously undergone a hair transplant at another clinic around 3 years earlier, but according to the provided case record, the outcome was poor.
Because this was a repair hair transplant case, the objective was not simply to add more grafts. The treatment needed to improve the appearance of the previously transplanted region, address inadequate coverage and create a more balanced frontal result while working with the available donor hair.
Patient Consent Notice
This case study should be published only with the patient’s appropriate consent.
Hair transplant outcomes vary from patient to patient depending on factors such as hair-loss pattern, donor quality, graft characteristics, healing response, scalp condition, post-treatment care, and individual growth cycles.
The 12-month result represents a mature stage of hair transplant growth, although minor improvements in hair thickness and texture may continue over time.
Grade of Baldness
Grade 3 – Repair Case
Technique
Implanter FUE
Grafts Required
2667 grafts
Sessions Required
1 session
Post-Care
Minoxidil solution + multivitamins, as advised.
Main Treatment Goals
A repair transplant is different from a first-time procedure.
In this case, the surgeon had to work around hair that had already been transplanted three years earlier. The existing grafts could not simply be ignored.
The procedure therefore required consideration of:
The objective was to improve the existing result rather than completely recreate the transplant from the beginning.
The repair procedure was planned using the Implanter FUE technique, with 2667 grafts allocated for the treatment.
The implantation strategy focused on improving coverage in the previously treated region while attempting to blend the additional grafts with the patient’s existing transplanted and native hair.
Because donor hair is especially valuable in revision cases, graft utilization needed to be conservative and strategically planned.
The patient was advised to follow the post-transplant instructions shown in the treatment record:
|
Parameter
|
No. of Grafts
|
Details
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
530
|
For natural hairline
|
|
|
2480
|
Mid scalp coverage
|
|
|
3010
|
|
During the first two weeks, the transplanted area begins healing and the newly implanted grafts settle into position.
Typical early changes may include:
The primary focus during this stage is protecting the newly implanted grafts.
Some of the newly transplanted hair shafts may temporarily shed during the early months.
During this phase:
This period can visually appear slower despite the follicles progressing through their normal growth cycle.
Around the fourth month, early transplanted hairs may begin emerging.
Possible changes include:
At this stage, the hair can still appear thin or uneven.
During months five and six, the transplanted hairs generally enter a more noticeable growth stage.
The repair area may begin showing:
The result is still developing at this point.
This phase is important in repair cases because the newly growing grafts increasingly contribute to the appearance of the previously unsuccessful transplant.
Possible improvements include:
By this stage, the correction may become significantly more noticeable than during the first six months.
During the later months, the transplanted hairs continue to mature.
The focus shifts from simply observing new growth to assessing:
At the 12-month milestone, the patient reached the primary maturation stage of his repair hair-transplant journey.
The 12-month assessment should focus on whether the additional 2667 Implanter FUE grafts successfully improved the appearance of the previously poorly performing transplant.
Important parameters include:
Because individual growth and maturation differ between patients, the photographs from the corresponding follow-up should be used when making specific visual-result claims.
In selected patients, revision surgery may improve density, coverage or hairline appearance. The treatment plan depends on the previous transplant and remaining donor hair.
The provided treatment record lists 2667 grafts
The repair procedure was performed using Implanter FUE according to the supplied case information.
Dr. Kiran Chotaliya is a leading hair transplant surgeon in Pune, specializing in advanced techniques like FUE and FUT for natural, lasting results. His expertise and patient-centered care ensure successful hair restoration with exceptional outcomes.
© 2026 Developed & Handle By Dr. Kiran Chotaliya Clinic Team
© 2026 Developed & Handle By Dr. Kiran Chotaliya Clinic Team
